The origin of
the universe of Amorphous Ice
Author; Rogelio Pérez
Casadiego
This work presents a new theory on the origin of the
universe of water ice amorphous, which appears in a state of low density, the
ice has the characteristics of having three spatial dimensions and one as the
dimensions of the existing universe, which by physical processes known in the
system thermodynamic closed, changes of phase, to explain the universe that we
see today. This theory is presented as a better alternative to the explanation
about the origin of the universe, that the big bang theory, because it does not
need laws of physics invalid or non-existent (singularity) to be able to
explain the first state of the universe.
Keywords;
Molecule of ion negative of hydroxyl, ion hydrogen
atoms, water ice. Dark matter, plasma.
Introduction;
This new theory on the origin of the universe, teaches
that the universe originates from the water ice amorphous. Affirms that the
universe was in a state of low density (which is a relationship between the
amount of the substance that contains and the volume that occupies) and
spontaneously occurred a sublimation. This change of state spontaneously is a
feature in the thermodynamic systems closed. When the ice changes to gas, this
process physical is known as sublimation. The increase in energy due to
sublimation, originated a movement of rotation in this matter (the sublimation
creates an effect of torsion in the bodies) This movement of rotation to the go increased,
produces a pressure in the gas, changing of State to the gas, in State liquid,
then this rotation in the body of water is increased to accelerate it
originating it energy electromagnetic, (all body enough hot emits radiation
electromagnetic in the spectrum visible), Then this electromagnetic energy ionize water molecules of the
universe, creating two classes of plasmas in the universe. A plasma of (+ H)
and another (-OH), as we know about the water molecules when ionize.
This hypothesis has antecedents in the old time the
pre-socratic philosopher and scientist Thales of Miletus, this referred to the
idea that everything was made of water, giving importance to the movement[i].
The scientific theory teaches that a mass that
accelerates will have to radiate energy, and the best candidate to accelerate
and radiate energy, is the water because of their molecular combination the
oxygen and the hydrogen, can be used as a raw material, to form all the
elements of the earth and the universe, as explained by the Doctor William A.
Fowleren in his writing the elements can be transmuted[ii], moreover
the percentage of the mass of the water molecule, explains perfectly 100%
of matter in the universe".
New origin of universe model pours water on Big Bang
theory; A new model in which the cosmos is filled with a “quantum fluid”
suggests that there was no Big Bang – and could explain the origin of two
mysterious components of the universe.[iii]
A swedish physicist
critic of the theory of the big bang and Nobel prize winner called Hannes Olof
Gösta Alfvén believed the problem with the Big Bang was that
astrophysicists tried to extrapolate the origin of the universe from mathematical theories developed on
the blackboard, rather than starting from known observable phenomena. He also
considered the Big Bang to be a scientific myth devised to
explain creation.[iv]
The singularity of
the Big Bang theory, comes out of the
math of Einstein's theory of general
relativity, which describes how mass warps space-time, and another equation (called
Raychaudhuri's equation) that predicts whether the trajectory of something will
converge or diverge over time. Going backward in time, according to these
equations, all matter in the universe was once in a single point — the Big Bang
singularity.
But that's not quite true. In Einstein's formulation,
the laws of physics actually break before the singularity is reached. But
scientists extrapolate backward as if the physics equations still hold, said
Robert Brandenberger, a theoretical cosmologist at McGill University in
Montreal.
There are other problems brewing in physics — namely,
that the two most dominant theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity,
can't be reconciled.[v]
Einstein had shown in 1915 as his theory could explain
the progress of the anomalous perihelion of the planet Mercury without any
parameter arbitrary. In the same way, in an expedition of 1919 led by Eddington
confirmed the prediction of general relativity for the diversion of starlight
by the Sun during the total solar eclipse of may 29, 1919[vi] . But not to mention the
disagreements by the data shown[vii], this confirmation was made with the
atmosphere of by middle which the water crystals at the top of the
atmosphere produce a similar effect, and also the discovery of water in mercury[viii], in the entire solar system and beyond[ix], could show the same effects, leave the
theory of relativity and everything that comes from her very weakened.
This theory also talk that the universe rotates due
the effect of torque produced by the sublimation of water ice, and the
scientist have said; “The universe was born spinning and continues to
do so around a preferred axis – that is the bold conclusion of physicists in
the US who have studied the rotation of more than 15,000 galaxies. While most
cosmological theories have suggested that – on a large scale – the universe is
the same in every direction, these recent findings suggest that the early
universe was born spinning about a specific axis”[x].
In the journal Nature came out in the following work
that talk of the sublimation:“Here we present a sublimation heat engine,
which can convert temperature differences into mechanical work via the
Leidenfrost effect. The rotational motion of the dry-ice loads is converted
into electric power by coupling to a magnetic coil system. We extend our
concept to liquid loads, generalizing the realization of the new engine to both
sublimation and the instantaneous vaporization of liquids. Our results support
the feasibility of low-friction in sit energy harvesting from both liquids and
ices”[xi].
Any new theory of the origin of the universe will have
to answer hypothetically some mysteries of science as dark matter and dark
energy, so it presented several concepts on these mysteries.
In astrophysics and cosmology physics is called dark
matter to the hypothetical matter that does not emit enough electromagnetic
radiation to be detected with current technical means, but whose existence can
be deduced from the gravitational effects it causes in visible matter, such as
the stars or galaxies, as well as in the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave
background present in the universe [xii].
In line with this theory of a universe originated from
the water, the water crystals comply perfectly with the characteristics of the
dark matter; invisibility for telescopes, the effects of gravitational lenses
and anisotropy [xiii].
There are also some ideas about what dark matter could
be, called, Wimps and Axions, first there are several experiments without being
able to find them, and the second (axions) the theory that predicts the
existence of this particle in practice is not met. “The Dirac-mass chaos
eventually destroys the exotic surface state,”magnetic monopoles or of axions.[xiv]
Another concept is on the expansion of the universe,
there is currently a scientific explanation, which proposes another explanation
of the expansion of the universe, which was published in the journal natural
that refers to the expansion of the mass of the atoms.[xv]
To explain the acceleration of the expansion of the universe, astrophysicists have invoked dark energy – a
hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space. A popular theory of
dark energy, however, does not fit new results on the value of the proton mass
divided by the electron mass in the early universe, the professor of astronomy
of the University of Arizona, Rodger Thompson finds that a popular alternative
to Albert Einstein's theory for the acceleration of the expansion of the
universe does not fit newly obtained data on a fundamental constant, the proton
to electron mass ratio[xvi].
A cosmological model with a large scale primordial
rotation term of this order can give an accelerating universe mimicking a dark
energy term."[xvii]
“Water is made of discrete, individual molecules,
which interact with each other according to the laws of quantum mechanics, but
liquid water appears continuous and flowing and transparent and refracting,”
explains Ted Jacobson, a physicist at the University of Maryland, College Park.
“These are all ‘emergent’ properties that cannot be found in the individual
molecules, even though they ultimately derive from the properties of those
molecules.”[xviii]
Materials and
methods
The method to perform this research was the method
analytical and synthetic, because the method of scientific evolution should be
mixed, both for the discovery to science instruction, which is we use two
species of method.
Results;
This theory teaches that the universe appears in a
state of low density such as ice water amorphous, the ice has the
characteristics of having three spatial dimensions and one as the dimensions of
the universe exist, this universe suffers a change of phase spontaneously
as it teaches them systems thermodynamic closed, this process physical is known
as sublimation, This rotational movement of this gas sublimed, causes a
pressure in the gas circulation, causing a change of phase known as
condensation, causing
a change of phase known as condensation, and is the transition from gas to
liquid, It is the transition
from gas to liquid and this liquid water continues its rotary motion, which
increases its acceleration, to begin to raise the level of energy of the atoms
of the water molecules to make appear the electromagnetic energy (all hot
enough body emits electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum), this electromagnetic energy originates a new change of
phase of matter, water gas by evaporation , then to the go increasing the
energy of this body, the energy electromagnetic radiated begins ionize the
molecules of water, originating a great plasma of two classes of matter, a plasma of (+H) that is equivalent to the 5%
approximately of all the matter of the universe, and other plasma of (OH) that
is equivalent to the 95% percent approximately of all the matter in the
universe. Then the universe of ions (-OH)changes quickly from phase of plasma
to solid crystal, that we cannot see, which originates the ice and water, and
the second plasma ions ( +H) which originates the gas ionic than we see in the
stars.
Conclusions;
As a conclusion we can say that the universe
originated from something called Amorphous Ice, responds better many of the
mysteries that today have in problem the theory of the big bang.
We can also say that the origin of light in the universe, which according to this theory is product of the radiation energy of the accelerated matter.
We can also say that the origin of light in the universe, which according to this theory is product of the radiation energy of the accelerated matter.
This theory teaches that the angular momentum that
gave rise to the rotational movement of the mass in the universe was the
sublimation of Amorphous Ice. This movement of rotation in the universe can be
explained by the effect of torque produced by the sublimation, of a universe
originated from rigid body (water crystals.).
Bibliographic;
http://www.natureasia.com/…/art…/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2015.18
http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0370269314009381
http://www.abc.es/20101126/ciencia/primer-universo-liquido-201011261436.html
http://es.wikihow.com/calcular-el-porcentaje-de-masa
Reaction on Water Ices(http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/)
Scientific America,
Sept. 1956. Vol 195.Pág. 82.
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-scientists-dip-mysterious-no-man.html#nRlv
http://actualidad.rt.com/ciencias/view/51975-gran-congelacion-nueva-alternativa-big-bang
http://news.discovery.com/space/do-we-live-in-a-spinning-universe-110708.htm
http://www.nature.com/news/cosmologist-claims-universe-may-not-be-expanding-1.1337
http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0370269314009381
[iv] Hannes Alfvén, Cosmology—Myth or Science? J
Astrophysics and Astronomy, vol. 5, pp. 79-98, (1984).
[xvii]http://prints.iiap.res.in/bitstream/2248/5767/1/Primordial%20Rotation%20of%20the%20Universe,%20Hydrodynamics.pdf


