miércoles, 7 de septiembre de 2016

The origin of the universe of Amorphous Ice

Author; Rogelio Pérez Casadiego

This work presents a new theory on the origin of the universe of water ice amorphous, which appears in a state of low density, the ice has the characteristics of having three spatial dimensions and one as the dimensions of the existing universe, which by physical processes known in the system thermodynamic closed, changes of phase, to explain the universe that we see today. This theory is presented as a better alternative to the explanation about the origin of the universe, that the big bang theory, because it does not need laws of physics invalid or non-existent (singularity) to be able to explain the first state of the universe.





Keywords;

Molecule of ion negative of hydroxyl, ion hydrogen atoms, water ice. Dark matter, plasma.

Introduction;

This new theory on the origin of the universe, teaches that the universe originates from the water ice amorphous. Affirms that the universe was in a state of low density (which is a relationship between the amount of the substance that contains and the volume that occupies) and spontaneously occurred a sublimation. This change of state spontaneously is a feature in the thermodynamic systems closed. When the ice changes to gas, this process physical is known as sublimation. The increase in energy due to sublimation, originated a movement of rotation in this matter (the sublimation creates an effect of torsion in the bodies) This movement of rotation to the go increased, produces a pressure in the gas, changing of State to the gas, in State liquid, then this rotation in the body of water is increased to accelerate it originating it energy electromagnetic, (all body enough hot emits radiation electromagnetic in the spectrum visible), Then this electromagnetic energy ionize water molecules of the universe, creating two classes of plasmas in the universe. A plasma of (+ H) and another (-OH), as we know about the water molecules when ionize.

This hypothesis has antecedents in the old time the pre-socratic philosopher and scientist Thales of Miletus, this referred to the idea that everything was made of water, giving importance to the movement[i].

The scientific theory teaches that a mass that accelerates will have to radiate energy, and the best candidate to accelerate and radiate energy, is the water because of their molecular combination the oxygen and the hydrogen, can be used as a raw material, to form all the elements of the earth and the universe, as explained by the Doctor William A. Fowleren in his writing the elements can be transmuted[ii], moreover  the percentage of the mass of the water molecule, explains perfectly 100% of matter in the universe".

New origin of universe model pours water on Big Bang theory; A new model in which the cosmos is filled with a “quantum fluid” suggests that there was no Big Bang – and could explain the origin of two mysterious components of the universe.[iii]

A swedish physicist critic of the theory of the big bang and Nobel prize winner called Hannes Olof Gösta Alfvén believed the problem with the Big Bang was that astrophysicists tried to extrapolate the origin of the universe from mathematical theories developed on the blackboard, rather than starting from known observable phenomena. He also considered the Big Bang to be a scientific myth devised to explain creation.[iv]

The singularity of  the Big Bang theory, comes out of the math of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which describes how mass warps space-time, and another equation (called Raychaudhuri's equation) that predicts whether the trajectory of something will converge or diverge over time. Going backward in time, according to these equations, all matter in the universe was once in a single point — the Big Bang singularity.

But that's not quite true. In Einstein's formulation, the laws of physics actually break before the singularity is reached. But scientists extrapolate backward as if the physics equations still hold, said Robert Brandenberger, a theoretical cosmologist at McGill University in Montreal.

There are other problems brewing in physics — namely, that the two most dominant theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, can't be reconciled.[v]

Einstein had shown in 1915 as his theory could explain the progress of the anomalous perihelion of the planet Mercury without any parameter arbitrary. In the same way, in an expedition of 1919 led by Eddington confirmed the prediction of general relativity for the diversion of starlight by the Sun during the total solar eclipse of may 29, 1919[vi] . But not to mention the disagreements by the data shown[vii], this confirmation was made with the atmosphere of by middle   which the water crystals at the top of the atmosphere produce a similar effect, and also the discovery of water in mercury[viii], in the entire solar system and beyond[ix], could show the same effects, leave the theory of relativity and everything that comes from her very weakened.

This theory also talk that the universe rotates due the effect of torque produced by the sublimation of water ice, and the scientist have said; “The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis – that is the bold conclusion of physicists in the US who have studied the rotation of more than 15,000 galaxies. While most cosmological theories have suggested that – on a large scale – the universe is the same in every direction, these recent findings suggest that the early universe was born spinning about a specific axis”[x].

In the journal Nature came out in the following work that talk of the sublimation:“Here we present a sublimation heat engine, which can convert temperature differences into mechanical work via the Leidenfrost effect. The rotational motion of the dry-ice loads is converted into electric power by coupling to a magnetic coil system. We extend our concept to liquid loads, generalizing the realization of the new engine to both sublimation and the instantaneous vaporization of liquids. Our results support the feasibility of low-friction in sit energy harvesting from both liquids and ices”[xi].

Any new theory of the origin of the universe will have to answer hypothetically some mysteries of science as dark matter and dark energy, so it presented several concepts on these mysteries.

In astrophysics and cosmology physics is called dark matter to the hypothetical matter that does not emit enough electromagnetic radiation to be detected with current technical means, but whose existence can be deduced from the gravitational effects it causes in visible matter, such as the stars or galaxies, as well as in the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background present in the universe [xii].

In line with this theory of a universe originated from the water, the water crystals comply perfectly with the characteristics of the dark matter; invisibility for telescopes, the effects of gravitational lenses and anisotropy [xiii].

There are also some ideas about what dark matter could be, called, Wimps and Axions, first there are several experiments without being able to find them, and the second (axions) the theory that predicts the existence of this particle in practice is not met. “The Dirac-mass chaos eventually destroys the exotic surface state,”magnetic monopoles or of axions.[xiv]

Another concept is on the expansion of the universe, there is currently a scientific explanation, which proposes another explanation of the expansion of the universe, which was published in the journal natural that refers to the expansion of the mass of the atoms.[xv]
To explain the acceleration of the expansion of the universe, astrophysicists have invoked dark energy – a hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space. A popular theory of dark energy, however, does not fit new results on the value of the proton mass divided by the electron mass in the early universe, the professor of astronomy of the University of Arizona, Rodger Thompson finds that a popular alternative to Albert Einstein's theory for the acceleration of the expansion of the universe does not fit newly obtained data on a fundamental constant, the proton to electron mass ratio[xvi].

A cosmological model with a large scale primordial rotation term of this order can give an accelerating universe mimicking a dark energy term."[xvii]

“Water is made of discrete, individual molecules, which interact with each other according to the laws of quantum mechanics, but liquid water appears continuous and flowing and transparent and refracting,” explains Ted Jacobson, a physicist at the University of Maryland, College Park. “These are all ‘emergent’ properties that cannot be found in the individual molecules, even though they ultimately derive from the properties of those molecules.”[xviii]

Materials and methods

The method to perform this research was the method analytical and synthetic, because the method of scientific evolution should be mixed, both for the discovery to science instruction, which is we use two species of method.


Results;

This theory teaches that the universe appears in a state of low density such as ice water amorphous, the ice has the characteristics of having three spatial dimensions and one as the dimensions of the universe exist, this universe suffers a change of phase spontaneously as it teaches them systems thermodynamic closed, this process physical is known as sublimation, This rotational movement of this gas sublimed, causes a pressure in the gas circulation, causing a change of phase known as condensation,  causing a change of phase known as condensation, and is the transition from gas to liquid, It is the transition from gas to liquid and this liquid water continues its rotary motion, which increases its acceleration, to begin to raise the level of energy of the atoms of the water molecules to make appear the electromagnetic energy (all hot enough body emits electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum), this electromagnetic energy originates a new change of phase of matter, water gas by evaporation , then to the go increasing the energy of this body, the energy electromagnetic radiated begins ionize the molecules of water, originating a great plasma of two classes of matter, a plasma of (+H) that is equivalent to the 5% approximately of all the matter of the universe, and other plasma of (OH) that is equivalent to the 95% percent approximately of all the matter in the universe. Then the universe of ions (-OH)changes quickly from phase of plasma to solid crystal, that we cannot see, which originates the ice and water, and the second plasma ions ( +H) which originates the gas ionic than we see in the stars.


Conclusions;

As a conclusion we can say that the universe originated from something called Amorphous Ice, responds better many of the mysteries that today have in problem the theory of the big bang.

We can also say that the origin of light in the universe, which according to this theory is product of the radiation energy of the accelerated matter.

This theory teaches that the angular momentum that gave rise to the rotational movement of the mass in the universe was the sublimation of Amorphous Ice. This movement of rotation in the universe can be explained by the effect of torque produced by the sublimation, of a universe originated from rigid body (water crystals.).





Bibliographic;

http://www.natureasia.com/…/art…/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2015.18
http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0370269314009381
http://www.abc.es/20101126/ciencia/primer-universo-liquido-201011261436.html
http://es.wikihow.com/calcular-el-porcentaje-de-masa
 Reaction on Water Ices(http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/)
Scientific America, Sept. 1956. Vol 195.Pág. 82.
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-scientists-dip-mysterious-no-man.html#nRlv
http://actualidad.rt.com/ciencias/view/51975-gran-congelacion-nueva-alternativa-big-bang
http://news.discovery.com/space/do-we-live-in-a-spinning-universe-110708.htm
http://www.nature.com/news/cosmologist-claims-universe-may-not-be-expanding-1.1337



[i] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tales_de_Mileto
[ii] Scientific America, Sept. 1956. Vol 195.Pág. 82.
[iii] http://www.natureasia.com/…/art…/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2015.18
http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0370269314009381
[iv] Hannes Alfvén, Cosmology—Myth or Science? J Astrophysics and Astronomy, vol. 5, pp. 79-98, (1984).
[v] http://www.livescience.com/49958-theory-no-big-bang.html
[viii] http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/30/nasa-finds-water-ice-mercury_n_2216282.html
[ix] http://phys.org/news/2015-04-solar-awash.html
[x] http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/jul/25/was-the-universe-born-spinning
[xi]http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150303/ncomms7390/full/ncomms7390.html
[xii] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materia_oscura
[xiii] http://rpc8abril.blogspot.com/
[xiv] http://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology-news/newsid=38955.php

[xix] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fot%C3%B3lisis


No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario